The Making of I, I, I, II, III a game for two to play

11123

If you’re impatient, you can get to the print and play rules and cards of I, I, I, II, III, otherwise continue reading how it came to be.

-: Making the Game :-

Last Thursday and Friday I ran a student and mentor game jam for all three years of the Games Design course at London College of Communication (@LCCLondon). We had six mentors in from outside the university to help the student teams.

In the final three hours of the game jam a conversation broke out between myself, one of the mentors Aubrey (@HilariousCow) and a student Andrew (@over1000inrhyme), who had been abandoned by the rest of his team. We were discussing the smallest board game possible.

  • A single cell
  • A single counter

It just so happened that the nearest counter was an othello piece (black on one side, white on the other) which opened some interesting properties about flipping the counter and changing states. Moving away from our single counter starting point we stacked two of the pieces on top of each other, and considered the different possible operations to perform on the stack.

Five cards were made for each of two players both having, flip top, flip bottom, flip stack, stick and swap, and the game started to take form.

Cards were played simultaneously face down, and then resolved in order, determined by the colour on top of the stack and the colour assigned to each of the players. The player that colour matches the top colour of the stack was rewarded a point.

The first few games were played with cards been returned to the hand and attempting to reach a score of five first. This did not feel quite right, then it became clear that the cards should not return to the hand and they should remain face down so there was an element of memory to the game.

After a couple of games it became apparent we had something interesting, and more of the attendees of the jam started to play and make suggestions. The biggest issue we had to resolve was the point scoring. We started with 1 point per round but it didn’t feel right. There was a need to have higher points in the later rounds. A lot of point schemes were tested and re-tested:

  • 1,2,3,4,5
  • 1,1,2,2,3
  • 1,1,1,3, (don’t play the final card)
  • 1,1,1,2,3

This final point scheme was the one we played with during the open gaming event and it seemed to feel right and this became our game title I, I, I, II, III.

-: Play the Game :-

Aubrey and I have spend the last day trying to formalise and write up the rules in a coherent manner in order that we could share this with everyone.

Click for the print and play rules

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s